CPA Central Invasions Review: 3/1/14

KLONDIKE, CPAC Headquarters – As large new group of wars arise this week, most being centered around Elmikey’s departure to the Doritos, we are here to bring you another Invasions Review.

  • The invading army will always be on the left, while the defending army will always be on the right.
  • The server will be displayed as follows: “Klondike:”
  • The arrow will be pointing toward the victor.
  • If the battle is disputed, the arrow will point both ways.
  • If the battle is agreed to be a tie, an equals sign will replace the arrows.
  • If one army posts of a battle on their site and the other army does not, the army that posts will be marked the victors on the review unless they formally admit defeat.

Weekly War Log

  • Doritos vs. Rebel Penguin Federation: Ongoing.
  • Doritos vs. Light Troops: Ongoing.
  • Doritos vs. Army Republic: Ongoing.
  • SWAT vs. Light Troops: Ongoing.
  • Army of Club Penguin vs. Dark Warriors: Ended.

Saturday, February 22


Sunday, February 23

Tuxedo: Doritos Rebel Penguin Federation

Monday, February 24

Big Surf: Rebel Penguin Federation Doritos

*Sleet: Army Republic Doritos

*Fog: Army Republic Doritos

Slushy: Light Troops SWAT/Doritos

Slushy: Army of Club Penguin Dark Warriors

Tuesday, February 25

Half Pipe: Rebel Penguin Federation Doritos

Thermal: Rebel Penguin Federation Doritos

*Summit: Army Republic Doritos

*Chinook: Army Republic Doritos

Snowbound: Light Troops SWAT/Doritos

North Pole: SWAT Light Troops

Wednesday, February 26

Snow Board: SWAT Light Troops

Thursday, February 27

Ascent: Rebel Penguin Federation Doritos

Freezer: Rebel Penguin Federation Doritos

Ice Cream: Light Troops Doritos

Friday, February 28

Alaska: Doritos Rebel Penguin Federation

*White Out: Army Republic Doritos

*-The Doritos and Army Republic made a treaty lasting to February 30, but being that the aforementioned date does not exist, their invasions are ruled valid. The Doritos have not shown at any of their 5 invasions, so they are all listed as victories.

And so, another week comes to a close with the invasions review. I apologize for a lack of a review last week, but being that there were only 2 invasions total, I deemed it unnecessary to post. Thank you for reading. Until next time,


CPA Central Editor in Chief


12 Responses

  1. Now for the Rage.

    • woo

  2. Isent DW battling DCP?

  3. Why does Zak get to decide whether the treaty is valid or not? Since when did CPAC get a say in any army affiliated treaties/ alliances?

    • Implying I did, personally? No. Multiple sources have shot down its validity.

    • I directed Zak to list them that way.

      A treaty cannot exist if the date upon which it is set to end does not exist. There is no argument you could possibly make about the validity here, especially since DCP is now attempting to say that the lack of a legitimate end date = “in perpetuity”.

      This isn’t a case where there is a real dispute; if the dates for the treaty don’t exist, it can’t exist, therefore it is invalid. However, for the sake of acknowledging DCP’s argument, we’ve asterisked the invasions as seen above.

      There is a point where ‘fairness’ must be forsaken for the purpose of simple logic. I see no reason to present a dispute where there is such an obvious logical solution; if I never drew the line between argument and logic, we’d be even worse off than we are presently with all this nonsense about not admitting defeat.

      • Due to not being in any of these armies, I have a very little say, if any, on this matter. I just don’t believe it is right that CPAC declares that the treaty is invalid, that’s all. No official statement was made by either DCP or AR on this “treaty” and although I agree this should be noted, the comment that it is a fallacious treaty was unnecessary.

        • Hey yeasy. Long time no see. Talk to me @

  4. we owned so bad. But you forgot battle of alsaka, it was on thursday and doritos won.

    • no i didnt

  5. Tuxedo belongs to DW. Nigga’s trying to ignore us.

    • lol naw

What do YOU think? Comment your opinion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: