Point in Focus: Sneak Attacks

Pontongpasir here reporting on a tactic used by some armies in battles: sneak attacks. Are they good or are they bad. Join me today while I delve deeper into these attacks.

All armies do it at least once. But the question is why? Here’s why. Armies feel that they aren’t as strong if they log on at the scheduled time. What’s the solution, have a sneak attack. They send in all their troops 30-60 minutes before the battle and then start claiming the server and any rogue troops on the opponents army. The only way to discover a sneak attack is by sending a scout to the server 1 hour before the battle. If an army sneak attacks 99% of the time they will win unless the scout can get to their chat and alert people. And that only works if it’s a full chat.

Sneak attacks in the army world are also known as cheating because the enemy has no time to prepare and get beaten. I have seen an example of a sneak attack when GD tried to re-invade outback 1 day early. However some armies classify sneak attacks as an automatic disqualification in their rules for the battle.

I interviewed the ST leader Vestd:

Me: What do you think about sneak attacks?
Vestd: I think they’re stupid
Me: Do you think they are unfair?
Vestd: Yes
Me: Why?
Vestd: Because they have no point and you just have to be scared or can’t beat the army scheduled in order to win.
Me: Thank you for your time. 
Vestd: ty

See even Vestd thinks sneak attacks suck. But people still attempt them some because they really want to win or if they can’t beat them. All in all to finish this post sneak attacks are very very bad as the enemy army does not have time to combat the army performing the sneak attack and ultimately the enemy army loses. This is unfair as many people have agreed with me so sneak attacks should be banned under CP army law. Many people agree. If more people agree to the petition sign below by typing e.g. x______Pontongpasir. But put your CP name down

Signing off~Pontongpasirofytcp, CPAC reporter

Comments

  1. You are a CPAC Reporter. You report the news, you do not act upon it. And you interviewed one person. Geez, what is CPAC hiring today?

  2. Pungy iPhone says:

    Lolwut. Is this some kind of joke? “CP army law”. Nobody uses “sneak attacks” because of the 24 hour rule.

  3. samanna1 says:

    I’m pretty sure every army always logs im 30 minutes early… xD

  4. Superoo13 says:

    x______Superoo13

    I believe it is okay if you say log on 15 mins early or even 20 mins early, but anything exceeding that is kind of cheating! Sometimes it backfires as penguins think that they have automatically won and leave, so the army loses! Well i think if you cheat like that, you deserver it!

  5. spongebobrox says:

    So ur saying if a army hides behind a tree in the ice rink and then comes out with a tactic when the other army comes in, its a bad thing and its against the rules? lolwut?

  6. Klug1234 says:

    What the heck is this? I’ve never heard the term “sneak attack” used in CP warfare. I’m against armies logging on way earlier than when battles begin, but it isn’t cheating, and EVERYONE does it.

    Whoever you are, please take a look at your job description before writing another post.

  7. CAPTAIN CAMPLAZLO3 says:

    i think it is dumb on CP because by the rules of war there has to be a 24 hour notice and be stated as invasion. if the defending army doesnt show, the oppossing army takes the server in half an hour. but in real life its the smartest thing ever

  8. billehb says:

    Many armies always log on like 30 minutes before battle… I don’t think many people are going to sign the petition…

    • Erica says:

      They log in early to gain rogues, therefore making themselves look bigger. But the rogues just fade away eventually, so there’s really no point. I don’t understand why people just get on 5-10 minutes before, we just waste 20 minutes of our time shouting “JOIN ____ TODAY!” .-.

  9. Gustav Holst says:

    x______Gustav_Holst

  10. Ek says:

    Thank you for that fantastic piece of utter truth.

  11. wtf….

  12. Lolwut?

  13. Purpledoo123 says:

    I’m sorry to say but this new CPAC Reporter needs some work. His topics arent that interesting.

    Please CPAC get your act together *cough* CPAC Sucks now *cough*

    SERIOUSLY???

    Grammar sucks if I had to grade him I give him a 6/10

  14. Rock4 says:

    Pontongpasir, your a reporter, you should be reporting on recent wars not philosiphy! Oy! What is it with reporters these days? ;(

  15. Rock4 says:

    *not a philosipher

  16. Sneak attacks? what the hell. I’ve heard of attacks against other armies at bad times, but sneak attacks are raids

  17. Purpledoo123 says:

    Delve? use Dwell you noob.
    Caps for proper nouns? GOD IS THIS KID 8 YEARS OLD?

  18. Gσяdy says:

    ok i seriously doubt that you have an IQ over 120

  19. яєχ says:

    More noob reporters on the horizion.

  20. Gaara14357 says:

    I cracked up laughing at the comments. Lol a law for sneak attacks? Trolololol.

  21. Ek says:

    “I can tell you what DNA stands for”

    We were joking about the IQ. Your obviously Einstein D:

  22. Ek says:

    Wait, your quite obviously Deliburger :lol:

  23. Onest says:

    Im guessing there is a difference between the pre-battle & a sneak attack.

  24. яєχ says:

    More noob einsten reporters on the horizion.

  25. Jeez, stop the cyberbullying.

Speak Your Mind

*